Doses
Si | InAsUC | InPUC | GaAsUC | SiGe | |
A2 | 1000 | 700 | ? | ? | ? |
A4 | 1000 | 700 | ? | 630 | ? |
A6 | 1200 | ? | ? | 760 | ? |
El6 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
El9 | ? | ? | ? | 420 | ? |
CSAR4 | 430 | ? | ? | ? | ? |
CSAR9 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
CSAR13 | 450 | ? | ? | 350 | ? |
50k+A4 | ? | ? | ? | 745 | ? |
Si | InAsUC | InPUC | GaAsUC | SiGe | |
A2 | 900 | ? | 300 | ? | ? |
A4 | 900 | ? | 500 | 630 | ? |
A6 | 1000 | ? | ? | 670 | ? |
El6 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
El9 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
CSAR4 | 400 | ? | ? | ? | ? |
CSAR9 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
CSAR13 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
50k+A4 | ? | ? | ? | 630 | ? |
- GaAs: Uniform clearing
- InP: Uniform clearing
- InAs: Uniform clearing
- Si: Optimal contrast
Note
Base dose does not change with resist thickness, developing time does. However, if the developing time is fixed, say to 60s, a thinner layer of resist will need lower "base dose", since it's being over developed.
Experimental
- Dose density matrix for small and large spot size.
- Measure CD as a function of dose and density for the two spot sizes.
- Intersection of the two plots, for a given density gives isofocal dose.
- Convert doses to dose factors, given that 0% isodose == PEC_df 0%
- Base dose == isofocal dose 0% / PEC_df 0%
- For density larger than 0%, predicted dose factor = (1+η)/(1+η*ρ*(1+φ/100))
- 1+η = PEC_df 0%
- Fit experimental isofocal dose factors and predicted dose factor by varying psi
125 kV:
InP: 607 uC/cm2 and phi = 35%
InAs:
Si: 906 uC/cm2 and phi = 45%
GaAs:752 uC/cm2 and phi = 39%
Si (μC/cm2) / φ | InAs (μC/cm2) / φ | InP (μC/cm2) / φ | GaAs (μC/cm2) / φ | SiGe (μC/cm2) / φ | |
A2 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
A4 | 906/ 45% | ? | 607/ 35% | 752/ 39% | ? |
A6 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
El6 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
El9 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
CSAR4 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
CSAR9 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
CSAR13 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |
50k+A4 | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? |